Configuration dependent

Jurisdiction

Policies set per brand and market: reality checks, affordability thresholds, risk scoring and trading limits, changed in configuration, not code.

The problem

Every market has its own rules. Hard-code them and every new market is a release; leave them loose and every audit is a scramble.

What the platform does

Policies are configuration. Each brand carries its own reality-check, affordability, risk-scoring, loyalty and trading policy, and the platform enforces them at the point each decision is made.

How it works

Follow it through.

  1. Brand policy
  2. Platform API
  3. Controls
  4. Every decision
  1. 01

    Agree the operator’s licence position and the markets it will serve.

  2. 02

    Set the brand’s policies in platform administration.

  3. 03

    The API applies those policies to every decision for that brand.

  4. 04

    Policy changes are recorded like any other staff action.

Controls

  • Reality-check interval and whether players can switch it off
  • Affordability threshold and rolling window
  • Risk-scoring model and bands
  • Trading limits

Operator experience

Brand configuration screens set each policy per brand, so two brands on one platform can run different rules.

Integration points

  • Geolocation provider, where the market requires it
  • Identity and exclusion schemes per market

Audit & reporting

Configuration changes are staff actions, written to the audit record.

Software is evidence

The real interface.

Not a mock-up. This is the implemented screen, populated by a test environment.

Brand configuration screen with loyalty tiers, reality-check policy and affordability policy set per brand
DemoBrand configuration: loyalty, reality-check and affordability policy set per brand. Illustrative data on a test environment.

Let’s talk about what you’re building.

Tell us what you’re building. We’ll tell you plainly what the platform does today and what it would take.